<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Code, Life and Learning - Latest Comments</title><link>http://codelifeandlearning.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://codelifeandlearning.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:19:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Complexity, Requirements and The Perfect Cup Of Tea</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=132#comment-856397901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Brian,&lt;br&gt;Just a quick message to ask if you would be interested in a ‘mutual’ following on twitter. I am currently following you now and am awaiting for your follow-back. (#FYI I do RT’s ‘anytime’ for all #Triathletes #Cyclists #UltraRunners #Marathoners #FitnessProfessionals who follow me on Twitter and have something important they want mentioned for support…)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All the very best for 2013 &amp;amp; beyond Brian. Look forward to hearing from you…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Darin&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/DarinArmstrong" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com/DarinArmstrong"&gt;twitter.com/DarinArmstrong&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;#TeamLIVESTRONG&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:19:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Complexity, Requirements and The Perfect Cup Of Tea</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=132#comment-400385206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scaling at this level will cause multiple issues. My recommendation: &lt;a href="http://www.johnlewis.com/231390198/Product.aspx?source=63258" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.johnlewis.com/231390198/Product.aspx?source=63258"&gt;http://www.johnlewis.com/23...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Lazarus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:00:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who needs values these days?</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=43#comment-347448238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's usually tough enough to get developers to list their parameters in line with the index but this obviously takes a step further the need to be very accurate with what you ask for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Abbott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:27:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot air extraction &amp;ndash; more efficient server room cooling</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=91#comment-309708388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the piping plug directly to the back of the servers, taking air from the server fans. Or do they hang unconnected and scoop up air in the general area?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew of Yorkshire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: viewmessages.com Architecture</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=98#comment-309702291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello @briandrought what are you up to?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew of Yorkshire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:45:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Managing clients patched calls with a single click</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=118#comment-309698741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Mr @Brian Drought &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew of Yorkshire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:42:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: viewmessages.com Architecture</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=98#comment-309591945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Testing mention of @fl600 to see what happens...   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Drought</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:58:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Re-inventing the spell checker</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=66#comment-305970313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting approach. How did you arrive at the weightings - have you tried tweaking them?  Also some opportunity here to introduce a naive Bayes classifier to make educated guesses on the 3 word tuples? And how about looking to correct grammar as well as spelling - so that you don't get "a lot" written in such a way it refers to the mythical beast?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Falkingbridge</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Making the &amp;lsquo;New Message Alert&amp;rsquo; slicker with jQuery AJAX</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=54#comment-305970262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;makes perfect sense to me&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:30:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who needs values these days?</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=43#comment-305970144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Brian! I found this post quite by random and as it happens I'm having the *exact same* issue with paramterised queries running madly slow compared to a straight SQL query, at one of my client sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm going to get my devs to go pull the code and see if it's the same param type issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the post! (and congrats, by the way)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tim.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Skipper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partitioning Data in SQL</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=46#comment-305970229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it better to have one large table or lots of little ones? Given both options wouldn't differ that greatly in space usage what are the advantages of splitting data out? I can only really see the increased dependencies and complexity between your code and your data. Add in multiple indexes on each table and it all sounds exponentially more difficult to maintain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Abbott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:58:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Partitioning Data in SQL</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=46#comment-305970225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What are you trying to achieve?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would be better to do in SQL rather than ASP?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have a table of Companies&lt;br&gt;With some fields of: CompanyName, CompanyID (as GUID)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The CompanyID then is your hash function (good enough for these purposes)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then when a new company is added use ASP or StoredProc to allocate the next free DB / Table combo (using simple counters from a reference data table).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then when doing the select do two pre-selects to get the Table and DB for the CustomerGUID in question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Concatenate these into the SELECT statements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I still don't know what you are trying to achieve. SQL can work very well on humongous data sets. Take a look at query analyzer and tuning tools (y)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Every guy needs a picture of a rocketship on his wall.</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=44#comment-305970183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant pic, I might have to order a copy. I don't recall a gift shop when I was there, otherwise the plastic would have taken a hit! I like your musings too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:21:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Every guy needs a picture of a rocketship on his wall.</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=44#comment-305970178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome pic mate.&lt;br&gt;Shame you didn't take it :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:14:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Every guy needs a picture of a rocketship on his wall.</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=44#comment-305970176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! What an amazing picture. And some interesting thoughts drawn out of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweaking the Message Review Page</title><link>http://www.briandrought.com/blog/?p=28#comment-305970042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty nice post. I just found your site and wanted to say &lt;br&gt;that I've really liked reading your blog posts. Any way &lt;br&gt;I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sarah</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:01:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>